Reference Guide

A. Functional Classification

This part follows the five categories of Nilsen's taxonomy and sets the theoretical function of each approach. Entries carry catalogue numbers 1 to 66. Strategy, adaptation, measurement and reporting tools (catalogue section D, items 136 to 170) sit on the Strategy and Measurement Tools page.

How do we move from plan to practice?Process modelse.g. Knowledge-to-Action,Quality ImplementationWhat helps or blocks implementation?Determinant frameworksCFIR (this course)Implementation theoriesCOM-B (this course),Normalization Process TheoryClassic theoriese.g. Diffusion of InnovationsDid it work, and how well?Evaluation frameworksRE-AIM and Proctor's outcomes(this course)
Nilsen's five categories, grouped by the question each answers. The middle band holds three kinds of tool for diagnosing barriers. Nilsen places COM-B with implementation theories, and this site's inventory does the same.

A1. Implementation Process Models

Definition: Models describing or guiding the stages, activities and processes involved in introducing, implementing, integrating, scaling up or sustaining an intervention or evidence-based practice.

Primary questionHow should we organise and navigate the implementation process?

No.Theory, model or frameworkPrimary functionPHC and immunization application
1Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) FrameworkKnowledge translation processTranslating evidence into routine immunization practice
2Iowa Model of Evidence-Based PracticeEvidence-to-practice processIntroducing evidence-based clinical and PHC practices
3Stetler Model of Research UtilizationResearch utilisationApplying research findings to immunization programme decisions
4Ottawa Model of Research UseResearch implementation processAssessing evidence, potential adopters and practice environments
5ACE Star Model of Knowledge TransformationEvidence translationMoving evidence through synthesis, recommendations and integration into practice
6Quality Implementation Framework (QIF)Implementation planning and executionPreparing facilities and districts for new interventions
7Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS)Phased implementationIntroducing and sustaining integrated PHC interventions
8Active Implementation Frameworks (AIF)Implementation infrastructure and driversEstablishing implementation teams, coaching and improvement infrastructure
9Interactive Systems Framework (ISF)Linking knowledge support and delivery systemsConnecting immunization technical assistance with frontline implementation
10Generic Implementation Framework (GIF)General implementation processStructuring intervention development, implementation and evaluation
11Implementation MappingSystematic implementation planningSelecting strategies to address determinants of poor immunization performance
12Ottawa Model of Implementation ResearchKnowledge translation and implementationSupporting research-informed clinical and organisational change
13Model for ImprovementIterative improvement processImproving immunization session performance through PDSA cycles
14Getting To Outcomes (GTO)Guided programme planning and evaluationSupporting local programme planning, implementation and improvement
15Framework for Effective ImplementationStructured implementation planningSupporting implementation of complex health interventions

The literature uses several similar names for this Ottawa Model. Check its exact publication and version before treating it as a separate entry from the Ottawa Model of Research Use.

The Model for Improvement and GTO are useful process approaches but are not necessarily implementation science theories in the strict Nilsen sense.

A2. Implementation Determinant Frameworks

Definition: Frameworks identifying, organising and explaining the contextual factors, barriers and facilitators behind implementation success.

Primary questionWhat factors influence implementation, and how do they interact?

No.Theory, model or frameworkPrincipal focusPHC and immunization application
16Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)Multilevel implementation determinantsExplaining variations in implementation across facilities, LGAs and states
17Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)Behavioural determinantsUnderstanding health worker practices and caregiver behaviours
18Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS)Evidence, context and facilitationUnderstanding evidence implementation in PHC organisations
19Integrated-PARIHS (i-PARIHS)Innovation, recipients, context and facilitationSupporting evidence implementation through facilitation
20Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)Multilevel determinants and outcomesUnderstanding contextual influences on reach, implementation and sustainability
21Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD) frameworkDeterminants of guideline implementationUnderstanding barriers to implementing clinical recommendations
22Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA)Acceptability determinantsUnderstanding acceptability of new immunization delivery approaches
23Health Equity Implementation Framework (HEIF)Equity-related implementation determinantsUnderstanding disparities affecting access and intervention implementation
24Equity-Based Framework for Implementation Research (EquIR)Equity in implementation researchExamining how structural and social conditions influence implementation
25Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)Organisational readinessAssessing facility and district readiness for implementation
26Implementation Climate FrameworkOrganisational support for implementationUnderstanding whether facilities support recommended practices
27Determinants of Implementation Effectiveness FrameworkOrganisational and contextual determinantsUnderstanding organisational influences on programme implementation
28Flottorp et al. checklist of determinantsBehavioural and organisational determinantsIdentifying barriers to changing professional practice
29Cabana et al. barriers frameworkKnowledge, attitudes and behavioural barriersUnderstanding provider non-adherence to clinical guidelines
30Pathman Awareness-to-Adherence ModelStages of professional behaviour changeAssessing adoption and adherence to immunization recommendations
31Greenhalgh et al. diffusion in service organisations frameworkInnovation, organisation and system determinantsUnderstanding adoption of innovations across PHC organisations
32Grol and Wensing implementation frameworkDeterminants of change in clinical practiceUnderstanding barriers to guideline implementation

The most important starting points here are CFIR, TDF, i-PARIHS, PRISM, HEIF and TICD. They provide complementary rather than interchangeable perspectives. CFIR offers a broad multilevel assessment of determinants, TDF provides more detailed behavioural analysis, and i-PARIHS emphasises facilitation as a central implementation mechanism.

A3. Classic Theories With Relevance to Implementation

Definition: Theories from broader disciplines, such as psychology, sociology, organisational science and behavioural science, which explain behaviours, decisions, relationships and social processes relevant to implementation.

Primary questionWhy do individuals, groups and organisations behave or respond in particular ways?

No.Theory, model or frameworkOriginal disciplinary orientationPHC and immunization application
33Diffusion of Innovations TheorySociology and communicationAdoption and spread of immunization innovations
34Social Cognitive TheoryPsychologyHealth worker self-efficacy and caregiver behaviour
35Theory of Planned BehaviourSocial psychologyIntentions and behaviours relating to vaccination
36Health Belief ModelHealth psychologyCaregiver perceptions and vaccine acceptance
37Social Ecological ModelPublic health and behavioural scienceMultilevel influences on access and vaccine uptake
38Self-Determination TheoryPsychologyHealth worker motivation
39Social Network TheorySociologyCommunity influence, trust and information diffusion
40Institutional TheoryOrganisational sociologyInstitutional influences on state and district implementation
41Street-Level Bureaucracy TheoryPublic administrationFrontline discretion and adaptation by health workers
42Resource Dependence TheoryOrganisational theoryInfluence of external funding and resource dependencies
43Principal-Agent TheoryEconomics and organisational theoryAccountability, delegation and performance management
44Complexity TheorySystems scienceNonlinear interactions and adaptation in health systems
45General Systems TheorySystems scienceInterdependence between PHC and immunization system components
46Andersen's Behavioural Model of Health Services UseHealth services researchFactors influencing service utilisation
47Social Capital TheorySociologyCommunity trust, participation and collective action
48Expectancy TheoryOrganisational psychologyMotivation and performance of frontline personnel
49Job Demands-Resources ModelOccupational psychologyWorkload, resources and health worker performance
50Transaction Cost EconomicsEconomicsCoordination and contracting arrangements in service delivery

Some of these theories come from outside implementation science. They appear here because they explain mechanisms relevant to implementation research. Tie each choice to a clearly specified research question.

Implementation science has also absorbed Diffusion of Innovations, and applies it more specifically than its original discipline did. Nilsen files COM-B and NPT as implementation theories.

A4. Implementation Theories

Definition: Theories specifically developed or adapted to explain mechanisms and processes through which implementation occurs, including how settings adopt, embed, adapt and sustain interventions.

Primary questionThrough what mechanisms does implementation happen, and why does it succeed or fail?

No.Theory, model or frameworkPrincipal contributionPHC and immunization application
51Normalization Process Theory (NPT)Explains how practices become embedded in routine workInstitutionalising integrated immunization services
52Organizational Implementation TheoryExplains organisational implementation processesUnderstanding organisational adoption of new practices
53Theory of Organizational Readiness for ChangeExplains collective commitment and efficacyUnderstanding facility and district readiness
54Dynamic Sustainability Theory/FrameworkExplains adaptation and ongoing improvementSustaining and adapting immunization interventions
55Implementation Theory of ChangeSpecifies causal pathways and mechanismsExplaining how strategies produce implementation outcomes
56Middle-Range Implementation TheoriesExplains specific implementation mechanismsDeveloping context-specific explanations of implementation variation

The Theory of Organizational Readiness for Change is closely related to ORIC, which operationalises aspects of readiness. The inventory cross-references the two. Dynamic sustainability is more commonly presented as a framework than as a single formally specified theory.

NPT is also used as a framework for analysing implementation determinants. Place it by the job it does in your study.

A5. Implementation Evaluation Frameworks

Definition: Frameworks guiding the assessment of implementation processes, outcomes, effectiveness, reach, adoption, fidelity, adaptation and sustainability.

Primary questionHow do we know whether implementation has been successful, for whom, under what circumstances and with what consequences?

No.Theory, model or frameworkPrincipal evaluation focusPHC and immunization application
57RE-AIMReach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenanceEvaluating immunization delivery interventions
58Proctor's Implementation Outcomes FrameworkEight implementation outcomesAssessing feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, adoption and sustainability
59PRISMContextual influences and implementation outcomesEvaluating intervention implementation and reach
60Carroll's Framework for Implementation FidelityAdherence and moderating factorsAssessing fidelity of immunization delivery strategies
61Linnan and Steckler Process Evaluation FrameworkImplementation process evaluationEvaluating intervention delivery and implementation processes
62Moore et al. Process Evaluation FrameworkImplementation, mechanisms and contextEvaluating complex PHC interventions
63PRECEDE-PROCEED ModelPlanning and evaluating health promotion programmesEvaluating community-based immunization interventions
64NHS Sustainability ModelOrganisational sustainabilityAssessing prospects for sustaining quality improvement
65Consolidated Framework for Sustainability Constructs in HealthcareSustainability determinants and constructsUnderstanding long-term maintenance of PHC interventions
66Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME)Adaptation assessmentEvaluating changes to interventions during implementation

The evaluation category requires particular care. Proctor's framework evaluates implementation outcomes, whereas RE-AIM examines implementation alongside intervention effectiveness and maintenance. They answer related but different questions.

StaRI is a reporting guideline, and FRAME-IS documents adaptations to strategies. Both sit in catalogue section D.