A. Functional Classification
This part follows the five categories of Nilsen's taxonomy and sets the theoretical function of each approach. Entries carry catalogue numbers 1 to 66. Strategy, adaptation, measurement and reporting tools (catalogue section D, items 136 to 170) sit on the Strategy and Measurement Tools page.
A1. Implementation Process Models
Definition: Models describing or guiding the stages, activities and processes involved in introducing, implementing, integrating, scaling up or sustaining an intervention or evidence-based practice.
Primary questionHow should we organise and navigate the implementation process?
| No. | Theory, model or framework | Primary function | PHC and immunization application |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) Framework | Knowledge translation process | Translating evidence into routine immunization practice |
| 2 | Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice | Evidence-to-practice process | Introducing evidence-based clinical and PHC practices |
| 3 | Stetler Model of Research Utilization | Research utilisation | Applying research findings to immunization programme decisions |
| 4 | Ottawa Model of Research Use | Research implementation process | Assessing evidence, potential adopters and practice environments |
| 5 | ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation | Evidence translation | Moving evidence through synthesis, recommendations and integration into practice |
| 6 | Quality Implementation Framework (QIF) | Implementation planning and execution | Preparing facilities and districts for new interventions |
| 7 | Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) | Phased implementation | Introducing and sustaining integrated PHC interventions |
| 8 | Active Implementation Frameworks (AIF) | Implementation infrastructure and drivers | Establishing implementation teams, coaching and improvement infrastructure |
| 9 | Interactive Systems Framework (ISF) | Linking knowledge support and delivery systems | Connecting immunization technical assistance with frontline implementation |
| 10 | Generic Implementation Framework (GIF) | General implementation process | Structuring intervention development, implementation and evaluation |
| 11 | Implementation Mapping | Systematic implementation planning | Selecting strategies to address determinants of poor immunization performance |
| 12 | Ottawa Model of Implementation Research | Knowledge translation and implementation | Supporting research-informed clinical and organisational change |
| 13 | Model for Improvement | Iterative improvement process | Improving immunization session performance through PDSA cycles |
| 14 | Getting To Outcomes (GTO) | Guided programme planning and evaluation | Supporting local programme planning, implementation and improvement |
| 15 | Framework for Effective Implementation | Structured implementation planning | Supporting implementation of complex health interventions |
The literature uses several similar names for this Ottawa Model. Check its exact publication and version before treating it as a separate entry from the Ottawa Model of Research Use.
The Model for Improvement and GTO are useful process approaches but are not necessarily implementation science theories in the strict Nilsen sense.
A2. Implementation Determinant Frameworks
Definition: Frameworks identifying, organising and explaining the contextual factors, barriers and facilitators behind implementation success.
Primary questionWhat factors influence implementation, and how do they interact?
| No. | Theory, model or framework | Principal focus | PHC and immunization application |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) | Multilevel implementation determinants | Explaining variations in implementation across facilities, LGAs and states |
| 17 | Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) | Behavioural determinants | Understanding health worker practices and caregiver behaviours |
| 18 | Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) | Evidence, context and facilitation | Understanding evidence implementation in PHC organisations |
| 19 | Integrated-PARIHS (i-PARIHS) | Innovation, recipients, context and facilitation | Supporting evidence implementation through facilitation |
| 20 | Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) | Multilevel determinants and outcomes | Understanding contextual influences on reach, implementation and sustainability |
| 21 | Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD) framework | Determinants of guideline implementation | Understanding barriers to implementing clinical recommendations |
| 22 | Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) | Acceptability determinants | Understanding acceptability of new immunization delivery approaches |
| 23 | Health Equity Implementation Framework (HEIF) | Equity-related implementation determinants | Understanding disparities affecting access and intervention implementation |
| 24 | Equity-Based Framework for Implementation Research (EquIR) | Equity in implementation research | Examining how structural and social conditions influence implementation |
| 25 | Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) | Organisational readiness | Assessing facility and district readiness for implementation |
| 26 | Implementation Climate Framework | Organisational support for implementation | Understanding whether facilities support recommended practices |
| 27 | Determinants of Implementation Effectiveness Framework | Organisational and contextual determinants | Understanding organisational influences on programme implementation |
| 28 | Flottorp et al. checklist of determinants | Behavioural and organisational determinants | Identifying barriers to changing professional practice |
| 29 | Cabana et al. barriers framework | Knowledge, attitudes and behavioural barriers | Understanding provider non-adherence to clinical guidelines |
| 30 | Pathman Awareness-to-Adherence Model | Stages of professional behaviour change | Assessing adoption and adherence to immunization recommendations |
| 31 | Greenhalgh et al. diffusion in service organisations framework | Innovation, organisation and system determinants | Understanding adoption of innovations across PHC organisations |
| 32 | Grol and Wensing implementation framework | Determinants of change in clinical practice | Understanding barriers to guideline implementation |
The most important starting points here are CFIR, TDF, i-PARIHS, PRISM, HEIF and TICD. They provide complementary rather than interchangeable perspectives. CFIR offers a broad multilevel assessment of determinants, TDF provides more detailed behavioural analysis, and i-PARIHS emphasises facilitation as a central implementation mechanism.
A3. Classic Theories With Relevance to Implementation
Definition: Theories from broader disciplines, such as psychology, sociology, organisational science and behavioural science, which explain behaviours, decisions, relationships and social processes relevant to implementation.
Primary questionWhy do individuals, groups and organisations behave or respond in particular ways?
| No. | Theory, model or framework | Original disciplinary orientation | PHC and immunization application |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33 | Diffusion of Innovations Theory | Sociology and communication | Adoption and spread of immunization innovations |
| 34 | Social Cognitive Theory | Psychology | Health worker self-efficacy and caregiver behaviour |
| 35 | Theory of Planned Behaviour | Social psychology | Intentions and behaviours relating to vaccination |
| 36 | Health Belief Model | Health psychology | Caregiver perceptions and vaccine acceptance |
| 37 | Social Ecological Model | Public health and behavioural science | Multilevel influences on access and vaccine uptake |
| 38 | Self-Determination Theory | Psychology | Health worker motivation |
| 39 | Social Network Theory | Sociology | Community influence, trust and information diffusion |
| 40 | Institutional Theory | Organisational sociology | Institutional influences on state and district implementation |
| 41 | Street-Level Bureaucracy Theory | Public administration | Frontline discretion and adaptation by health workers |
| 42 | Resource Dependence Theory | Organisational theory | Influence of external funding and resource dependencies |
| 43 | Principal-Agent Theory | Economics and organisational theory | Accountability, delegation and performance management |
| 44 | Complexity Theory | Systems science | Nonlinear interactions and adaptation in health systems |
| 45 | General Systems Theory | Systems science | Interdependence between PHC and immunization system components |
| 46 | Andersen's Behavioural Model of Health Services Use | Health services research | Factors influencing service utilisation |
| 47 | Social Capital Theory | Sociology | Community trust, participation and collective action |
| 48 | Expectancy Theory | Organisational psychology | Motivation and performance of frontline personnel |
| 49 | Job Demands-Resources Model | Occupational psychology | Workload, resources and health worker performance |
| 50 | Transaction Cost Economics | Economics | Coordination and contracting arrangements in service delivery |
Some of these theories come from outside implementation science. They appear here because they explain mechanisms relevant to implementation research. Tie each choice to a clearly specified research question.
Implementation science has also absorbed Diffusion of Innovations, and applies it more specifically than its original discipline did. Nilsen files COM-B and NPT as implementation theories.
A4. Implementation Theories
Definition: Theories specifically developed or adapted to explain mechanisms and processes through which implementation occurs, including how settings adopt, embed, adapt and sustain interventions.
Primary questionThrough what mechanisms does implementation happen, and why does it succeed or fail?
| No. | Theory, model or framework | Principal contribution | PHC and immunization application |
|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | Normalization Process Theory (NPT) | Explains how practices become embedded in routine work | Institutionalising integrated immunization services |
| 52 | Organizational Implementation Theory | Explains organisational implementation processes | Understanding organisational adoption of new practices |
| 53 | Theory of Organizational Readiness for Change | Explains collective commitment and efficacy | Understanding facility and district readiness |
| 54 | Dynamic Sustainability Theory/Framework | Explains adaptation and ongoing improvement | Sustaining and adapting immunization interventions |
| 55 | Implementation Theory of Change | Specifies causal pathways and mechanisms | Explaining how strategies produce implementation outcomes |
| 56 | Middle-Range Implementation Theories | Explains specific implementation mechanisms | Developing context-specific explanations of implementation variation |
The Theory of Organizational Readiness for Change is closely related to ORIC, which operationalises aspects of readiness. The inventory cross-references the two. Dynamic sustainability is more commonly presented as a framework than as a single formally specified theory.
NPT is also used as a framework for analysing implementation determinants. Place it by the job it does in your study.
A5. Implementation Evaluation Frameworks
Definition: Frameworks guiding the assessment of implementation processes, outcomes, effectiveness, reach, adoption, fidelity, adaptation and sustainability.
Primary questionHow do we know whether implementation has been successful, for whom, under what circumstances and with what consequences?
| No. | Theory, model or framework | Principal evaluation focus | PHC and immunization application |
|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | RE-AIM | Reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance | Evaluating immunization delivery interventions |
| 58 | Proctor's Implementation Outcomes Framework | Eight implementation outcomes | Assessing feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, adoption and sustainability |
| 59 | PRISM | Contextual influences and implementation outcomes | Evaluating intervention implementation and reach |
| 60 | Carroll's Framework for Implementation Fidelity | Adherence and moderating factors | Assessing fidelity of immunization delivery strategies |
| 61 | Linnan and Steckler Process Evaluation Framework | Implementation process evaluation | Evaluating intervention delivery and implementation processes |
| 62 | Moore et al. Process Evaluation Framework | Implementation, mechanisms and context | Evaluating complex PHC interventions |
| 63 | PRECEDE-PROCEED Model | Planning and evaluating health promotion programmes | Evaluating community-based immunization interventions |
| 64 | NHS Sustainability Model | Organisational sustainability | Assessing prospects for sustaining quality improvement |
| 65 | Consolidated Framework for Sustainability Constructs in Healthcare | Sustainability determinants and constructs | Understanding long-term maintenance of PHC interventions |
| 66 | Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) | Adaptation assessment | Evaluating changes to interventions during implementation |
The evaluation category requires particular care. Proctor's framework evaluates implementation outcomes, whereas RE-AIM examines implementation alongside intervention effectiveness and maintenance. They answer related but different questions.
StaRI is a reporting guideline, and FRAME-IS documents adaptations to strategies. Both sit in catalogue section D.